Biography
Biography pending.
Conference contributions 2
AUTOMATED FUTURES, DIMINISHED SELVES:
The dilemma of sustainability and stultification in AI societies
The swift evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in areas like governance, education, healthcare, and environmental sustainability has led to what can be termed automated futures socio-technical systems designed for efficiency, predictability, and control. However, as AI systems grow more "intelligent," there's a real concern that human intellectual vitality could stagnate. This paper delves into the ethical dilemma between sustainability and cognitive decline in societies driven by AI, suggesting that the quest for digital sustainability might unintentionally undermine the intellectual independence of its human creators. Drawing on Jacques Rancière's idea of stultification and Andrew Feenberg's Critical Theory of Technology, the study critically analyzes how algorithmic authority alters human reasoning, fostering dependence and reducing reflective thought. Using a Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the research explores the complex power–knowledge dynamics within discussions about AI-driven sustainability, examining how discourse legitimizes AI as a rational authority while subtly sidelining human judgment. By utilizing secondary data including government AI policies, corporate ethics frameworks, and global media narratives, the study uncovers a prevailing narrative that celebrates machine precision while overshadowing human deliberation. Such narratives risk nurturing passive digital identities and undermining democratic engagement. The findings urge a redefinition of sustainability that goes beyond just technical and ecological aspects to include ethical and epistemological considerations. Ultimately, the paper champions the integration of critical thinking into AI education, promotes algorithmic transparency, and encourages active digital citizenship. Without protecting intellectual freedom, sustainability could become a hollow goal achieved through technological advancement but at the cost of humanity's creative and critical spirit.
ALGORITHMIC AMPLIFICATION OF RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.
The swift rise of social media platforms has significantly altered how religious beliefs, viewpoints, and identities are articulated in the digital realm. Yet, these platforms also play a role in fostering religious intolerance through algorithmic systems that aim to enhance user engagement. This study investigates how algorithms on digital platforms magnify content that is religiously intolerant and the implications this has for safeguarding religious freedom. The research posits that social media algorithms are not impartial technological instruments; they frequently favor emotionally charged, divisive, and controversial content. Consequently, hostility directed at minority religious groups can proliferate rapidly and reach broader audiences. Employing a qualitative and interdisciplinary methodology, this research integrates insights from human rights law, digital governance, cyber studies, and media theory. It examines the interplay between algorithmic amplification, online hate narratives, and the mounting challenges encountered by religious minorities in digital environments. Additionally, it delves into how recommendation systems, trending features, and automated content distribution may inadvertently promote discrimination, exclusion, and digital harassment against vulnerable religious.